Showing posts with label Batman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Batman. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Shittiest Game of the Year Award! "Batman: Arkham Knight" (PC-Steam)

To compensate for the lack of new titles in my library in 2014, I gave my GOTY to Two Worlds, a 2007 open-world RPG that I had the most fun with last year. In 2015, however, my GOTY is undoubtedly The Witcher 3 and it's a moot point typing five-hundred words about why one of the most celebrated RPGs of all time is a good game.

So instead, I'll write these words for the shittiest game I played this year. I'd originally give this to Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain, but as disappointed as I was with that game, it did have solid stealth mechanics that entertained me for hours on-end. Fortunately, soon after I played another game and it was a real piece of shit.



Where does one even begin with Batman: Arkham Knight? How about the fact that, on the PC, the game was so broken that after massive complaints about its performance, it was pulled from the Steam Store a day after release? It returned to the Store three months later, with a patch that fixed fuck all and, even now, it's the only game in the entire catalogue (as far as I know) that users can refund regardless of how many hours they've played or how long they've owned it. Yes, you cannot refund The Slaughtering Grounds if you've played for more than two hours, but Arkham Knight? Here's your money back, sir!


Sunday, February 2, 2014

[NEWS] Jesse Eisenberg cast as Lex Luthor and Jeremy Irons as Alfred

There are a few legitimately interesting news coming from the sequel to "Man of Steel", which really ought to be named properly at some point. It's shock after shock with this thing, though that's not necessarily a bad thing.

So, after learning that Batman and then Wonder Woman would be in this, with rumours of more Justice League members making at least an appearance, after Ben-frigging-Affleck cast as the Dark Knight, we now finally have two more names added to the cast.

Jeremy Irons, a talented and distinguished actor, is Alfred Pennyworth, Batman's trusted butler and surrogate father figure. Irons is a fantastic actor, but he never sold me as a normal, seemingly mild-mannered butler. That's not a complaint, I'm merely wondering whether or not they'll take another direction for the character, particularly the one from "Batman: Earth One", where Alfred was a trained and active English Secret Service agent before taking over custody of young Bruce.



Of course the one everyone's been talking about is Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. People have lost their collective shit over this. Common complaints are common: he looks too young, he's skinny, he just doesn't look the part.

All of the aforementioned complaints are, naturally, absolute bollocks and they are all a diversion from the real protest:

"He's not Bryan Cranston"

Listen to me: I like Bryan Cranston and he would be a perfect Lex Luthor, but get over yourselves you entitled little dip-shits. I think Jon Hamm should've been Superman, it didn't happen. How can you realistically have a problem with this? Not seeing Lex in him right now I get, but are you really telling me that a talented, Academy Award, Golden Globes and BAFTA (among others)- nominated actor will not be able to pull off a role?

You do realize that's kind of how acting works, right? You don't need to have seen these people in similar roles before, you need to let them do their jobs, especially when they have proved that they have to skills. 


By the by, opinions respected and all that PC-bullshit, but at what point exactly did you start thinking that actors, especially skilled actors, require your permission to stretch their abilities and progress their careers and take it in new and interesting directions?

Get over yourselves; about Eisenberg, about Gadot (as Wonder Woman), about Affleck. The casting directors definitely have a better idea what they're doing than you and Warner is riding far, far too much on this entire project to take chances.

Fan-manip of Eisenberg as Lex Luthor. Looks fine to me!


Which leads to another point entirely; the entire branding for this movie has changed. "Man of Steel", love it or hate it, was promoted a very particular way. There was an idea, there was a vision, but most of all there was a desperate need to make it work financially and in terms of popularity. Especially considering that the legal dispute between DC Comics and the Jerry Siegel estate left the property in jeopardy, Warner had to release a new movie by the end of 2013 to maintain the rights to the character.

So "Man of Steel" had to play it safe, if not in terms of the actual material (which took chances with a lot of its plot and story decisions), then definitely in terms of promoting it. So, it was branded as the "realistic" approach to Superman, piggy-backing on the success of the Dark Knight Trilogy, with the names of Christopher Nolan and David Goyer all over the trailers and press releases.

The new film has changed entirely. Not only is it no longer a solo-Superman movie, but the driving forces behind it are promoting it differently as well.

The earlier fast-tracking has been stopped. The film has been delayed a whole year, to find a release spot that won't be challenged (particularly by Marvel), which will also undoubtedly give time to polish the film and its inescapable DC Cinematic Universe continuations.

Then, Nolan seems entirely absent from the more recent press-releases. The big name they sold "Man of Steel" on is gone, which actually makes sense considering he was mostly in a supervisory position during the first film as well. Then Goyer is no longer the head-writer; he's credited for the story, but the script is actually penned (or at least re-written and polished) by Chris Terrio, who recently won an Oscar for his screenplay of Affleck's "Argo".

That in itself is pretty big for two reasons: for one, the main problem with "Man of Steel", the terrible script that dragged down the entire film, is (probably) out of the picture now with a much better writer tending to it. Secondly, it points to a thought everybody had since Affleck was announced as Batman: he was chosen not just as a good fit for Snyder's vision of Batman in this series, but also for his connections with talent as a director. He will likely bring people he has worked with on board and he may even helm the directing duties himself in one of these movies (be it the upcoming Batman films or even Justice League).



Finally, one small interesting note is that DC's very own Geoff Johns is now listed as a producer. I was never a huge fan of Johns' work, particularly on Superman titles, but one can't deny the dude has good knowledge of and grasp on the characters and the source material.

For all intends and purposes, it seems "Batman VS Superman" and whatever films follow are taking a different direction. They're branded as huge projects with Academy Award prestige and will probably take a more light-hearted, more comic-book-like approach with the gravitas of big names and multi-million-dollar production values.

I liked "Man of Steel" a lot, but it was a deeply flawed (if not fundamentally broken) film. If it was merely a jumping off point for better things to come, colour me very intrigued and hopeful for the future of Warner's super-hero blockbusters.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

[BOOK REVIEW] "Batman: Earth One"

You know what's funny? There was a time when Batman was almost unique in never getting any "proper" origin stories. Even when he was introduced his origin wasn't told until a few issues later and even then it was only briefly.

Now it seems you can't take two steps without someone taking a shot at it, however indirectly and though once upon a time it was that Bruce had moved on from that tragic event and kept leaping off rooftops for the betterment of Gotham City, all original stories will reference the origin at least once.

I guess it makes sense in the case of this book, though. The "Earth One" graphic novels are DC's effort to appeal to a more mainstream audience, with a more dramatic and humanistic approach to the iconic characters.


 



"Batman: Earth One" is penned by Geoff Jones, one of DC's top dogs and a talented writer, whose work though I was never a big fan of. Plus I still blame him for ruining Superman after Infinite Crisis, pushing the character back to the same Donnerverse and Silver Age aesthetic and universe he'd grown out of decades ago.

It's also drawn by Gary Frank, Johns' collaborator at the time and genuinely talented artist, whose illustrations I grew less fond of as he drew Superman in the likeness of the late Christopher Reeve; something that (surprisingly) became exceedingly creepy over time.

Johns takes a few liberties in this re-telling, but for the most part he draws from past Batman history and the pacing is roughly the same as all early Batman stories.

Dr. Thomas Wayne is running for mayor of Gotham City (with the monicker "Gotham's Knight"; cute). His wife Martha, also a prominent figure as someone who has dedicated a lot of time on the criminally insane, is running his campaign. Everything shows he's going to win.

They're having an early, unofficial party about the upcoming election's expected result, when they're visited by one of Thomas' old friends: Alfred Pennyworth, former British Special Service, who has seen tons of action alongside Thomas. Dr Wayne calls him on because he needs security with the death threats increasing at a rate diversely proportional to the days left until the election.

Despite Alfred's protests, the couple take their son, Bruce, to see a movie. When the lights at the movie theater suspiciously go out, Bruce throws a hissy-fit for not being able to see the film. Then the little shit runs out the back-alley, bumps on Joe Chill, eagerly tells him to fuck off as he's the richest kid in Gotham and promptly gets his parents killed.

Whoops.

Fast-forward years later, Alfred has trained Bruce to be able to defend himself, as Bruce is on the hunt to find his parent's killers, who he believes are tied to then-running-opponent of his dad's, Mayor Oswald Cobblepot. Yes, that Cobblepot.

Who dares (be a butler) wins.


In the meantime, Detective James Gordon, broken by the spirit of the city, is paired with newcomer Detective Harvey Bullock and together they end up hunting a little girls' serial killer (and rapist?) in the employee of the mayor.

There's a lot of good in the book, as well as a few things that make the read unexpectedly underwhelming. Alfred is probably the most noticeable departure from his classic depiction. Alfred's past as an agent/war veteran isn't new and it's been written into the character for a very long time, but it's the first time (in my recollection, at least) he's in full "mentor" mode, instead of overly English mild-mannered butler.

He's not really even the Waynes' butler and only poses as one after Thomas and Martha have been murdered and he becomes the child's legal guardian. He walks with a cane and he has a prosthetic leg. He's rough, has no sense of humour and prepares Bruce for a war.

It comes as a shocking, though not entirely-unexpected, twist at the end that he is the one that deals with Cobblepot: swiftly, brutally, with no remorse, he deals justice entirely antithetical to that of Batman's.

The other major character in the book outside of Batman is none other than James Gordon, still a detective. Gordon for most of this book is broken. His heart is in the right place, but he is terrified. After his wife's supposed accident, he tries to back away from enforcing the law. In fear of consequences that will harm his daughter, Barbara, he leaves criminals be and let's them rampage through the streets.

Likely the most interesting and well-rounded character in this first book is Harvey Bullock. Harvey is the well-meaning, but ultimate ill-mannered fat asshole of the GCPD; it's how we've known him for years. In "Batman: Earth One", he's a former celebrity, a TV cop running a reality cop show. After the show's cancelled, he's looking for his way back into fame by purposefully transferring to Gotham and tasking himself with solving the murders of the Waynes, believing it to be just the high-profile case he needs.

Even though his goals are less than noble, Harvey is never unlikable in the book. He cares about the Law and the people. He wants to do his job, prevent crime and help citizens. He's the driving force behind getting Gordon back on his feet as a cop. His portrayal makes his fall at the end all the more tragic, as he witnesses the true horror that lies in Gotham's underbelly, which ultimately breaks him as well.

Villains are very underplayed, including Cobblepot, who only gets vague references to his better-known Penguin persona and they all seem to exist purely to service the development of all the good guys.

The other character that feels somewhat underplayed is none other than the supposed protagonist, Batman. As this is practically his first adventure, Batman kinda sucks at being Batman still. So he is not stealthy, his gadgets originally don't work (not until he gets Lucius Fox to fix them for him), he has no Batmobile (he drives around in his personal car) and he gets his ass kicked. A lot.

DC's greatest thinker at work.


This is to be expected, but there are two things that don't work about this portrayal. A rookie Batman wouldn't be the Batgod his insufferable fanboys think he's ought to be all the time, but there are no cool moments for him in the entire book. His first public reveal, his appearance that makes Gotham aware of his existence, is an abject failure. Dude corners a guy that may be connected to his parents murder, then gets jumped by another guy. Then, he gets shot at repeatedly and rescued by Alfred.

As the story progresses, he gets his shit together, but he shares the panels with Gordon and Bullock and honestly, their arc in this story is just a hell of a lot more interesting. By that point, the stakes are high for Gordon (Barbara has been kidnapped) and it's a turning point for Bullock, but Batman's just there to stop the serial killer.

Afterwards he goes after Cobblepot, but he gets his ass kicked again. With an umbrella. It's Alfred that ultimately wins that battle and he does it contrary to everything Bruce has been crusading for.

It's not bad by any stretch of the imagination, it's just perplexing. It's not just the lack of the "Batman coolness factor", it's also the absence of what could have made that lack work: character development and exploration.

I can only imagine Johns purposefully left a lot of ends open to explore in later books, because there is far too much set up here, sometimes to a ridiculous degree. Young Bruce's spoiled-brat attitude got his parents killed. In all Batman origin stories, Bruce wonders at some point if it was all his fault, but in almost all of them none of Bruce's actions have any direct correlation to the outcome of that tragic night.

In Batman Begins he can only be blamed for dragging them out early, because the opera scared him and usually it's Thomas that insists cutting through that alley. They're just ambushed there.

Considering Johns purposefully dropped at least a fraction of responsibility onto Bruce in this story, there is a surprisingly little amount of Batman blaming himself or at least questioning his actions that night. Batman is on a journey of vengeance; nothing less nothing more. He elevates himself to more than that by the end of the book, but it feels like he does so because that's what's expected of the story.

I just can't get a handle on him in this story. The Waynes are written to be Gotham's most prolific family (something I really dislike and it's far too common in Batman stories these days). Martha, his mom, is now Martha Arkham-Wayne. Yes, Bruce is the descendant of Amadeus Arkham, the founder of the Asylum and he has mental health issues in his family medical history.

I'm also pretty sure that the manor where Martha grew up is supposed to become Arkham Asylum (which seems to not exist yet in this version).

When I saw that, I was intrigued. Perhaps we'll tap into Bruce's psyche, perhaps we'll debate how sane and well-adjusted he truly is considering both the trauma he has suffered and his family's history with insanity. After all, using all your money to make toys and running around in a bat costume is not exactly a healthy way to deal with loss.

But no, in the few moments Bruce actually is in the story, he's a kid; a spoiled kid, with far too much money that sets out to do what the cops can't for entirely selfish reasons. Again, this changes at the end, Batman is starting to become a legend and we see change sweeping across Gotham as well, which is always nice to see.

But it's a light-switch change. We guess it's because he learns the not-so-shocking truth behind the events that made him an orphan, but it's only there for seconds.

Put this next to "Batman Begins" that follows a similar path and Bruce has got over that "dead parents" thing earlier into the story. By the time he finishes his training and he returns to Gotham, he already seeks to help the helpless and clean up the city. He sets out to be a legend, to be a symbol and while he's also work-in-progress (ski-masks, being easily beaten by the Scarecrow in their first encounter), his presence leaves an impression.

In "Earth One", you can cut Batman out of this story entirely and you'll have lost very little. His supporting cast just leave a bigger impression and especially in Gordon's case, it seems like it's his story, his city, his pathos. In the end, he's the one who changes, the one truly redeemed. Bruce is just going through the motions.

I'll stop being critical at this point though, because I don't want to give off the wrong impression. "Batman: Earth One" is a very good read. It has good pacing, it has interesting characters, it has solid dialogue and the art is fantastic.

I can appreciate Frank's illustrations now that I don't need to look at a dead actor for the whole book and there are two things that make his work here great to look at: the first is the Batman costume, which is likely my favorite design of the Dark Knight's gear ever. It's simple, it keeps its colors muted by dropping the gold/yellow almost entirely, it drops the briefs and there are no excesses in terms of putting armor on him, or ridiculously large bat-ears or -god forbid- bat-nipples.

Undoubtedly my favorite Batman design, semi-plausible without sacrificing sleekness.



The other thing I always liked about Frank's art is that it doesn't look as ridiculously polished as a lot of the post '90s comic book artwork. There is a attention to detail, but nothing overdone and his illustrations carry a realistic depiction of people and places, without resorting to the photo-realistic art style of Alex Ross. His use of shading is masterful, his facial expressions carry the scene's emotional weight beautifully and whenever his characters move, you actually get the feeling of animation instead of the glorified posing that many other artists do.

For all my complaints, I really did enjoy reading through "Batman: Earth One". In the end, even those complaints aren't so much faults as they are decisions that merely baffle me. As this is meant to be a series, it's off to a pretty solid start in general and while far from the defining Batman story (origin or otherwise), I recommend the book in itself.


"Batman: Earth One" was published by DC Comics. Batman and all related names, logos etc. are property of Warner Bros/DC Comics.

Batman was created by BILL FINGER & Bob Kane.

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Ben Affleck is the new Batman!

Apparently, Warner Bros woke up today and thought it'd be fun to explode the Internet, so they cast Ben Affleck as the new Batman in the upcoming Man of Steel sequel that will feature the Caped Crusader.








I wasn't in the least bit excited about the Superman/Batman crossover taking the place of a proper Man of Steel sequel; call me a fanboy all you want, but it took nearly thirty years and a boatload of cinematic flops to make Superman popular again and all of a sudden the rubber-nippled freak hijacks the next movie? It's Warner falling back on Batman's popularity at the expense of everyone else as usual.


So yes, let it sink in, Ben Affleck is Batman and you may hate him on the role or you may sit back for a second, think and admit that while not that great an actor, he's experienced and had his moments (particularly in Kevin Smith films), so he may actually deliver. That's not what matters right now.

What matters is this:

If this pans out, Affleck won't just be the *new* Batman, he will be the DEFINING Batman for years to come. Not because of his performance (which remains to be seen, obviously), but because he will also be Batman in the relaunched movie series AND the (likely to be made) Justice League movie.

Can you grasp this? Your children will grow up reading Batman comic books and place BEN AFFLECK, face and voice, in them.

Sorry, I'm not opposed to the idea, it just blows my mind considering how high-profile the guy's career has been compared to most other super-hero actors.

Interestingly, this isn't the first time Affleck dons superhero tights. Not only did he play Daredevil in 2003, but he also did a small movie where he portrayed late actor George Reeves, famous for his role as Superman in the 1950s TV show.

So yeah. Finger-cuffs' boyfriend is Batman. Who would've thought?